No Cover Image

Journal article 432 views 63 downloads

Rise and Recharge: Effects on Activity Outcomes of an e-Health Smartphone Intervention to Reduce Office Workers’ Sitting Time

Abby Morris, Kelly Mackintosh Orcid Logo, David Dunstan, Neville Owen, Paddy Dempsey, Thomas Pennington, Melitta McNarry Orcid Logo

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Volume: 17, Issue: 24, Start page: 9300

Swansea University Authors: Abby Morris, Kelly Mackintosh Orcid Logo, Thomas Pennington, Melitta McNarry Orcid Logo

  • 55867 (2).pdf

    PDF | Version of Record

    © 2020 by the authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license

    Download (583.15KB)

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.3390/ijerph17249300

Abstract

This feasibility study evaluated the effects of an individual-level intervention to target office workers total and prolonged sedentary behaviour during working hours, using an e-health smartphone application. A three-arm (Prompt-30 or 60 min Intervention arm and a No-Prompt Comparison arm), quasi-r...

Full description

Published in: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
ISSN: 1660-4601 1660-4601
Published: MDPI AG 2020
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa55867
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract: This feasibility study evaluated the effects of an individual-level intervention to target office workers total and prolonged sedentary behaviour during working hours, using an e-health smartphone application. A three-arm (Prompt-30 or 60 min Intervention arm and a No-Prompt Comparison arm), quasi-randomised intervention was conducted over 12 weeks. Behavioural outcomes (worktime sitting, standing, stepping, prolonged sitting, and physical activity) were monitored using accelerometers and anthropometrics measured at baseline, 6 weeks and 12 weeks. Cardiometabolic measures were taken at baseline and 12 weeks. Fifty-six office workers (64% female) completed baseline assessments. The Prompt-60 arm was associated with a reduction in occupational sitting time at 6 (−46.8 min/8 h workday [95% confidence interval = −86.4, −6.6], p < 0.05) and 12 weeks (−69.6 min/8 h workday [−111.0, −28.2], p < 0.05) relative to the No-Prompt Comparison arm. Sitting was primarily replaced with standing in both arms (p > 0.05). Both Intervention arms reduced time in prolonged sitting bouts at 12 weeks (Prompt-30: −27.0 [−99.0, 45.0]; Prompt-60: −25.8 [−98.4, 47.4] min/8 h workday; both p > 0.05). There were no changes in steps or cardiometabolic risk. Findings highlight the potential of a smartphone e-health application, suggesting 60 min prompts may present an optimal frequency to reduce total occupational sedentary behaviour.
Keywords: feasibility; workplace; intervention; sedentary behaviour; physical activity; sitting; activity breaks
College: Faculty of Science and Engineering
Issue: 24
Start Page: 9300

Similar Items