Journal article 901 views 188 downloads
Enhancing trust in clinical decision support systems: a framework for developers
BMJ Health & Care Informatics, Volume: 28, Issue: 1, Pages: e100247 - 8
Swansea University Author: Caroline Jones
-
PDF | Version of Record
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC.
Download (584.23KB)
DOI (Published version): 10.1136/bmjhci-2020-100247
Abstract
Systematic reviews show that clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) can improve clinical management and patient outcomes; but clinicians have reported their reluctance to use CDSSs, citing concerns about accuracy and reliability. Trust is crucial for relationships between the developers of inform...
Published in: | BMJ Health & Care Informatics |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2632-1009 |
Published: |
London
BMJ
2021
|
Online Access: |
Check full text
|
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa56101 |
first_indexed |
2021-01-22T11:35:23Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2021-11-19T04:21:38Z |
id |
cronfa56101 |
recordtype |
SURis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2021-11-18T12:59:15.0486891</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>56101</id><entry>2021-01-22</entry><title>Enhancing trust in clinical decision support systems: a framework for developers</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>8201817d55a832f7c23f406402904a2b</sid><ORCID>0000-0001-7632-9468</ORCID><firstname>Caroline</firstname><surname>Jones</surname><name>Caroline Jones</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2021-01-22</date><deptcode>HRCL</deptcode><abstract>Systematic reviews show that clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) can improve clinical management and patient outcomes; but clinicians have reported their reluctance to use CDSSs, citing concerns about accuracy and reliability. Trust is crucial for relationships between the developers of information systems and their users, and is a contemporary concern for policymakers. We applied O’Neill’s trust and trustworthiness framework in our analysis of the problem of clinicians’ concerns over the use of CDSSs (as reported in a recent pilot survey), to enhance our understanding of how to improve trust and trustworthiness in health and care informatics, and explore how CDSS developers can use the framework to increase their trustworthiness. Applying O’Neill’s framework generated suggestions for CDSS developers to adopt to improve clinical trust in them and their products. We discuss how this might support informaticians in their quest to understand and improve user-system relationships.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>BMJ Health & Care Informatics</journal><volume>28</volume><journalNumber>1</journalNumber><paginationStart>e100247</paginationStart><paginationEnd>8</paginationEnd><publisher>BMJ</publisher><placeOfPublication>London</placeOfPublication><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint/><issnElectronic>2632-1009</issnElectronic><keywords>Trust, trustworthiness, clinical decision support systems, developers, regulation</keywords><publishedDay>4</publishedDay><publishedMonth>6</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2021</publishedYear><publishedDate>2021-06-04</publishedDate><doi>10.1136/bmjhci-2020-100247</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Hillary Rodham Clinton Law School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>HRCL</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm>Payment of the OA fee split between two institutions</apcterm><funders>Hillary Rodham Clinton School of Law & Nottingham Law School (using staff research budgets)</funders><lastEdited>2021-11-18T12:59:15.0486891</lastEdited><Created>2021-01-22T11:25:06.1401009</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Caroline</firstname><surname>Jones</surname><orcid>0000-0001-7632-9468</orcid><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>James</firstname><surname>Thornton</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Jeremy C</firstname><surname>Wyatt</surname><order>3</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>56101__20225__b831a7a98222448d9a081eb09db0ed9a.pdf</filename><originalFilename>56101.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2021-06-23T12:45:54.4974325</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>598250</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC.</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
2021-11-18T12:59:15.0486891 v2 56101 2021-01-22 Enhancing trust in clinical decision support systems: a framework for developers 8201817d55a832f7c23f406402904a2b 0000-0001-7632-9468 Caroline Jones Caroline Jones true false 2021-01-22 HRCL Systematic reviews show that clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) can improve clinical management and patient outcomes; but clinicians have reported their reluctance to use CDSSs, citing concerns about accuracy and reliability. Trust is crucial for relationships between the developers of information systems and their users, and is a contemporary concern for policymakers. We applied O’Neill’s trust and trustworthiness framework in our analysis of the problem of clinicians’ concerns over the use of CDSSs (as reported in a recent pilot survey), to enhance our understanding of how to improve trust and trustworthiness in health and care informatics, and explore how CDSS developers can use the framework to increase their trustworthiness. Applying O’Neill’s framework generated suggestions for CDSS developers to adopt to improve clinical trust in them and their products. We discuss how this might support informaticians in their quest to understand and improve user-system relationships. Journal Article BMJ Health & Care Informatics 28 1 e100247 8 BMJ London 2632-1009 Trust, trustworthiness, clinical decision support systems, developers, regulation 4 6 2021 2021-06-04 10.1136/bmjhci-2020-100247 COLLEGE NANME Hillary Rodham Clinton Law School COLLEGE CODE HRCL Swansea University Payment of the OA fee split between two institutions Hillary Rodham Clinton School of Law & Nottingham Law School (using staff research budgets) 2021-11-18T12:59:15.0486891 2021-01-22T11:25:06.1401009 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law Caroline Jones 0000-0001-7632-9468 1 James Thornton 2 Jeremy C Wyatt 3 56101__20225__b831a7a98222448d9a081eb09db0ed9a.pdf 56101.pdf 2021-06-23T12:45:54.4974325 Output 598250 application/pdf Version of Record true © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. true eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
title |
Enhancing trust in clinical decision support systems: a framework for developers |
spellingShingle |
Enhancing trust in clinical decision support systems: a framework for developers Caroline Jones |
title_short |
Enhancing trust in clinical decision support systems: a framework for developers |
title_full |
Enhancing trust in clinical decision support systems: a framework for developers |
title_fullStr |
Enhancing trust in clinical decision support systems: a framework for developers |
title_full_unstemmed |
Enhancing trust in clinical decision support systems: a framework for developers |
title_sort |
Enhancing trust in clinical decision support systems: a framework for developers |
author_id_str_mv |
8201817d55a832f7c23f406402904a2b |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
8201817d55a832f7c23f406402904a2b_***_Caroline Jones |
author |
Caroline Jones |
author2 |
Caroline Jones James Thornton Jeremy C Wyatt |
format |
Journal article |
container_title |
BMJ Health & Care Informatics |
container_volume |
28 |
container_issue |
1 |
container_start_page |
e100247 |
publishDate |
2021 |
institution |
Swansea University |
issn |
2632-1009 |
doi_str_mv |
10.1136/bmjhci-2020-100247 |
publisher |
BMJ |
college_str |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
department_str |
Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Hilary Rodham Clinton School of Law |
document_store_str |
1 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
Systematic reviews show that clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) can improve clinical management and patient outcomes; but clinicians have reported their reluctance to use CDSSs, citing concerns about accuracy and reliability. Trust is crucial for relationships between the developers of information systems and their users, and is a contemporary concern for policymakers. We applied O’Neill’s trust and trustworthiness framework in our analysis of the problem of clinicians’ concerns over the use of CDSSs (as reported in a recent pilot survey), to enhance our understanding of how to improve trust and trustworthiness in health and care informatics, and explore how CDSS developers can use the framework to increase their trustworthiness. Applying O’Neill’s framework generated suggestions for CDSS developers to adopt to improve clinical trust in them and their products. We discuss how this might support informaticians in their quest to understand and improve user-system relationships. |
published_date |
2021-06-04T14:08:32Z |
_version_ |
1822139574294413312 |
score |
11.048626 |