No Cover Image

Journal article 692 views 267 downloads

Strategies towards Cost Reduction in the Manufacture of Printable Perovskite Solar Modules

Dena Pourjafari, Simone Meroni Orcid Logo, Diecenia Peralta Domínguez, Renán Escalante, Jenny Baker Orcid Logo, Alessary Saadi Monroy, Adrian Walters, Trystan Watson Orcid Logo, Gerko Oskam

Energies, Volume: 15, Issue: 2, Start page: 641

Swansea University Authors: Simone Meroni Orcid Logo, Jenny Baker Orcid Logo, Adrian Walters, Trystan Watson Orcid Logo

  • energies-15-00641.pdf

    PDF | Version of Record

    © 2022 by the authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license

    Download (1.92MB)

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.3390/en15020641

Abstract

Among different perovskite solar cell architectures, the carbon-based perovskite solar cell (C-PSC) is a promising candidate for upscaling and commercialization related to low-cost components and simple manufacturing methods. For upscaling a PV technology, three parameters must be considered, corres...

Full description

Published in: Energies
ISSN: 1996-1073
Published: MDPI AG 2022
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa59242
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2022-01-25T11:32:53Z
last_indexed 2023-01-11T14:40:23Z
id cronfa59242
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2022-08-17T11:51:42.6088143</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>59242</id><entry>2022-01-25</entry><title>Strategies towards Cost Reduction in the Manufacture of Printable Perovskite Solar Modules</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>78a4cf80ab2fe6cca80716b5d357d8dd</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-6901-772X</ORCID><firstname>Simone</firstname><surname>Meroni</surname><name>Simone Meroni</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>6913b56f36f0c8cd34d8c9040d2df460</sid><ORCID>0000-0003-3530-1957</ORCID><firstname>Jenny</firstname><surname>Baker</surname><name>Jenny Baker</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>1c09d71c5cec1d81adcb9a16eae44608</sid><firstname>Adrian</firstname><surname>Walters</surname><name>Adrian Walters</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>a210327b52472cfe8df9b8108d661457</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-8015-1436</ORCID><firstname>Trystan</firstname><surname>Watson</surname><name>Trystan Watson</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2022-01-25</date><deptcode>MTLS</deptcode><abstract>Among different perovskite solar cell architectures, the carbon-based perovskite solar cell (C-PSC) is a promising candidate for upscaling and commercialization related to low-cost components and simple manufacturing methods. For upscaling a PV technology, three parameters must be considered, corresponding to efficiency, stability, and cost. While the efficiency and lifetime of perovskite technology are the focus of many research groups, the cost parameter is less studied. This work aims to provide information on the manufacturing cost of C-PSC based on experimental data in order to give the readers a panoramic overview of parameters influencing a fabrication process. To analyze the commercialization viability of this technology, we estimated the cost of raw materials and the manufacturing process for sub-modules using two different methods: registration and scribing. The fabrication cost of a sub-module fabricated using the scribing method with 7.9% efficiency was approximately 44% less than that of a device with 6.8% efficiency prepared using registration. We demonstrated that this is due to both the design parameters and performance. In addition, we showed a 51% cost reduction for registration devices by appropriate choice of solar cell components, fabrication steps, and equipment based on the existing infrastructures for the manufacturing of large-scale devices.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Energies</journal><volume>15</volume><journalNumber>2</journalNumber><paginationStart>641</paginationStart><paginationEnd/><publisher>MDPI AG</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint/><issnElectronic>1996-1073</issnElectronic><keywords>manufacturing cost analysis, perovskite module, printable solar cells</keywords><publishedDay>17</publishedDay><publishedMonth>1</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2022</publishedYear><publishedDate>2022-01-17</publishedDate><doi>10.3390/en15020641</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Materials Science and Engineering</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>MTLS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><funders>This research was funded by CONACYT-SENER, and the NEWTON FUND of the British Council for the financial support under grant number &#x201C;FSE-291504&#x201D;, the GLOBAL RESEARCH TRANSLATION AWARD through the project &#x201C;Power to the people: Democratising energy through decentralised manufacture and production of affordable, reliable, sustainable solar power&#x201D;, &#x201C;EGR 1295&#x201D;, the ROYAL SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION AWARD, &#x201C; ICA\R1\191321&#x201D;; the NEWTON FUND IMPACT SCHEME &#x201C;541128962&#x201D;, and CONACYT under the FORDECYTPRONACES project &#x201C;318703&#x201D;. Also, this work was made possible by support from the UKRI Global Challenge Research Fund project SUNRISE (EP/P032591/1).</funders><projectreference/><lastEdited>2022-08-17T11:51:42.6088143</lastEdited><Created>2022-01-25T11:30:42.5424249</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Science and Engineering</level><level id="2">School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Materials Science and Engineering</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Dena</firstname><surname>Pourjafari</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Simone</firstname><surname>Meroni</surname><orcid>0000-0002-6901-772X</orcid><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Diecenia Peralta</firstname><surname>Dom&#xED;nguez</surname><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Ren&#xE1;n</firstname><surname>Escalante</surname><order>4</order></author><author><firstname>Jenny</firstname><surname>Baker</surname><orcid>0000-0003-3530-1957</orcid><order>5</order></author><author><firstname>Alessary Saadi</firstname><surname>Monroy</surname><order>6</order></author><author><firstname>Adrian</firstname><surname>Walters</surname><order>7</order></author><author><firstname>Trystan</firstname><surname>Watson</surname><orcid>0000-0002-8015-1436</orcid><order>8</order></author><author><firstname>Gerko</firstname><surname>Oskam</surname><order>9</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>59242__22214__bb8bb22f42fc4aafa7a0dd7f6edcdf25.pdf</filename><originalFilename>energies-15-00641.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2022-01-25T11:30:42.5423791</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>2015990</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>&#xA9; 2022 by the authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2022-08-17T11:51:42.6088143 v2 59242 2022-01-25 Strategies towards Cost Reduction in the Manufacture of Printable Perovskite Solar Modules 78a4cf80ab2fe6cca80716b5d357d8dd 0000-0002-6901-772X Simone Meroni Simone Meroni true false 6913b56f36f0c8cd34d8c9040d2df460 0000-0003-3530-1957 Jenny Baker Jenny Baker true false 1c09d71c5cec1d81adcb9a16eae44608 Adrian Walters Adrian Walters true false a210327b52472cfe8df9b8108d661457 0000-0002-8015-1436 Trystan Watson Trystan Watson true false 2022-01-25 MTLS Among different perovskite solar cell architectures, the carbon-based perovskite solar cell (C-PSC) is a promising candidate for upscaling and commercialization related to low-cost components and simple manufacturing methods. For upscaling a PV technology, three parameters must be considered, corresponding to efficiency, stability, and cost. While the efficiency and lifetime of perovskite technology are the focus of many research groups, the cost parameter is less studied. This work aims to provide information on the manufacturing cost of C-PSC based on experimental data in order to give the readers a panoramic overview of parameters influencing a fabrication process. To analyze the commercialization viability of this technology, we estimated the cost of raw materials and the manufacturing process for sub-modules using two different methods: registration and scribing. The fabrication cost of a sub-module fabricated using the scribing method with 7.9% efficiency was approximately 44% less than that of a device with 6.8% efficiency prepared using registration. We demonstrated that this is due to both the design parameters and performance. In addition, we showed a 51% cost reduction for registration devices by appropriate choice of solar cell components, fabrication steps, and equipment based on the existing infrastructures for the manufacturing of large-scale devices. Journal Article Energies 15 2 641 MDPI AG 1996-1073 manufacturing cost analysis, perovskite module, printable solar cells 17 1 2022 2022-01-17 10.3390/en15020641 COLLEGE NANME Materials Science and Engineering COLLEGE CODE MTLS Swansea University This research was funded by CONACYT-SENER, and the NEWTON FUND of the British Council for the financial support under grant number “FSE-291504”, the GLOBAL RESEARCH TRANSLATION AWARD through the project “Power to the people: Democratising energy through decentralised manufacture and production of affordable, reliable, sustainable solar power”, “EGR 1295”, the ROYAL SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION AWARD, “ ICA\R1\191321”; the NEWTON FUND IMPACT SCHEME “541128962”, and CONACYT under the FORDECYTPRONACES project “318703”. Also, this work was made possible by support from the UKRI Global Challenge Research Fund project SUNRISE (EP/P032591/1). 2022-08-17T11:51:42.6088143 2022-01-25T11:30:42.5424249 Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Materials Science and Engineering Dena Pourjafari 1 Simone Meroni 0000-0002-6901-772X 2 Diecenia Peralta Domínguez 3 Renán Escalante 4 Jenny Baker 0000-0003-3530-1957 5 Alessary Saadi Monroy 6 Adrian Walters 7 Trystan Watson 0000-0002-8015-1436 8 Gerko Oskam 9 59242__22214__bb8bb22f42fc4aafa7a0dd7f6edcdf25.pdf energies-15-00641.pdf 2022-01-25T11:30:42.5423791 Output 2015990 application/pdf Version of Record true © 2022 by the authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license true eng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
title Strategies towards Cost Reduction in the Manufacture of Printable Perovskite Solar Modules
spellingShingle Strategies towards Cost Reduction in the Manufacture of Printable Perovskite Solar Modules
Simone Meroni
Jenny Baker
Adrian Walters
Trystan Watson
title_short Strategies towards Cost Reduction in the Manufacture of Printable Perovskite Solar Modules
title_full Strategies towards Cost Reduction in the Manufacture of Printable Perovskite Solar Modules
title_fullStr Strategies towards Cost Reduction in the Manufacture of Printable Perovskite Solar Modules
title_full_unstemmed Strategies towards Cost Reduction in the Manufacture of Printable Perovskite Solar Modules
title_sort Strategies towards Cost Reduction in the Manufacture of Printable Perovskite Solar Modules
author_id_str_mv 78a4cf80ab2fe6cca80716b5d357d8dd
6913b56f36f0c8cd34d8c9040d2df460
1c09d71c5cec1d81adcb9a16eae44608
a210327b52472cfe8df9b8108d661457
author_id_fullname_str_mv 78a4cf80ab2fe6cca80716b5d357d8dd_***_Simone Meroni
6913b56f36f0c8cd34d8c9040d2df460_***_Jenny Baker
1c09d71c5cec1d81adcb9a16eae44608_***_Adrian Walters
a210327b52472cfe8df9b8108d661457_***_Trystan Watson
author Simone Meroni
Jenny Baker
Adrian Walters
Trystan Watson
author2 Dena Pourjafari
Simone Meroni
Diecenia Peralta Domínguez
Renán Escalante
Jenny Baker
Alessary Saadi Monroy
Adrian Walters
Trystan Watson
Gerko Oskam
format Journal article
container_title Energies
container_volume 15
container_issue 2
container_start_page 641
publishDate 2022
institution Swansea University
issn 1996-1073
doi_str_mv 10.3390/en15020641
publisher MDPI AG
college_str Faculty of Science and Engineering
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofscienceandengineering
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Science and Engineering
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofscienceandengineering
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Science and Engineering
department_str School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Materials Science and Engineering{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Science and Engineering{{{_:::_}}}School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Materials Science and Engineering
document_store_str 1
active_str 0
description Among different perovskite solar cell architectures, the carbon-based perovskite solar cell (C-PSC) is a promising candidate for upscaling and commercialization related to low-cost components and simple manufacturing methods. For upscaling a PV technology, three parameters must be considered, corresponding to efficiency, stability, and cost. While the efficiency and lifetime of perovskite technology are the focus of many research groups, the cost parameter is less studied. This work aims to provide information on the manufacturing cost of C-PSC based on experimental data in order to give the readers a panoramic overview of parameters influencing a fabrication process. To analyze the commercialization viability of this technology, we estimated the cost of raw materials and the manufacturing process for sub-modules using two different methods: registration and scribing. The fabrication cost of a sub-module fabricated using the scribing method with 7.9% efficiency was approximately 44% less than that of a device with 6.8% efficiency prepared using registration. We demonstrated that this is due to both the design parameters and performance. In addition, we showed a 51% cost reduction for registration devices by appropriate choice of solar cell components, fabrication steps, and equipment based on the existing infrastructures for the manufacturing of large-scale devices.
published_date 2022-01-17T04:16:24Z
_version_ 1763754098571608064
score 11.017797

Similar Items