No Cover Image

Journal article 52 views 22 downloads

Determining jumping performance from a single body-worn accelerometer using machine learning

Mark White, Neil Bezodis Orcid Logo, Jonathon Neville, Huw Summers Orcid Logo, Paul Rees Orcid Logo

PLOS ONE, Volume: 17, Issue: 2, Start page: e0263846

Swansea University Authors: Mark White, Neil Bezodis Orcid Logo, Huw Summers Orcid Logo, Paul Rees Orcid Logo

  • 59326.pdf

    PDF | Version of Record

    © 2022 White et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License

    Download (2.13MB)

Abstract

External peak power in the countermovement jump is frequently used to monitor athlete training. The gold standard method uses force platforms, but they are unsuitable for field-based testing. However, alternatives based on jump flight time or Newtonian methods applied to inertial sensor data have no...

Full description

Published in: PLOS ONE
ISSN: 1932-6203
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2022
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa59326
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract: External peak power in the countermovement jump is frequently used to monitor athlete training. The gold standard method uses force platforms, but they are unsuitable for field-based testing. However, alternatives based on jump flight time or Newtonian methods applied to inertial sensor data have not been sufficiently accurate for athlete monitoring. Instead, we developed a machine learning model based on characteristic features (functional principal components) extracted from a single body-worn accelerometer. Data were collected from 69 male and female athletes at recreational, club or national levels, who performed 696 jumps in total. We considered vertical countermovement jumps (with and without arm swing),sensor anatomical locations, machine learning models and whether to use resultant or triaxial signals. Using a novel surrogate model optimisation procedure, we obtained the lowest errors with a support vector machine when using the resultant signal from a lower back sensor in jumps without arm swing. This model had a peak power RMSE of 2.3 W·kg-1 (5.1% of the mean), estimated using nested cross validation and supported by an independent holdout test (2.0 W·kg-1). This error is lower than in previous studies, although it is not yet sufficiently accurate for a field-based method. Our results demonstrate that functional data representations work well in machine learning by reducing model complexity in applications where signals are aligned in time. Our optimisation procedure also was shown to be robust can be used in wider applications with low-cost, noisy objective functions.
College: College of Engineering
Issue: 2
Start Page: e0263846