No Cover Image

Journal article 296 views 68 downloads

A comparative analysis of pulp-derived nanocelluloses for 3D bioprinting facial cartilages

Thomas Jovic, Tamsin Nicholson, Hari Arora Orcid Logo, Kim Nelson, Shareen Doak Orcid Logo, Iain Whitaker

Carbohydrate Polymers, Volume: 321, Start page: 121261

Swansea University Authors: Thomas Jovic, Hari Arora Orcid Logo, Shareen Doak Orcid Logo, Iain Whitaker

  • 64062.VOR.pdf

    PDF | Version of Record

    © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (CC BY 4.0).

    Download (7.73MB)

Abstract

Nanocelluloses have attracted significant interest in the field of bioprinting, with previous research outlining the value of nanocellulose fibrils and bacterial nanocelluloses for 3D bioprinting tissues such as cartilage. We have recently characterised three distinct structural formulations of pulp...

Full description

Published in: Carbohydrate Polymers
ISSN: 0144-8617 1879-1344
Published: Elsevier BV 2023
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa64062
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract: Nanocelluloses have attracted significant interest in the field of bioprinting, with previous research outlining the value of nanocellulose fibrils and bacterial nanocelluloses for 3D bioprinting tissues such as cartilage. We have recently characterised three distinct structural formulations of pulp-derived nanocelluloses: fibrillar (NFC), crystalline (NCC) and blend (NCB), exhibiting variation in pore geometry and mechanical properties. In light of the characterisation of these three distinct entities, this study investigated whether these structural differences translated to differences in printability, chondrogenicity or biocompatibility for 3D bioprinting anatomical structures with human nasoseptal chondrocytes. Composite nanocellulose-alginate bioinks (75:25 v/v) of NFC, NCC and NCB were produced and tested for print resolution and fidelity. NFC offered superior print resolution whereas NCB demonstrated the best post-printing shape fidelity. Biologically, chondrogenicity was assessed using real time quantitative PCR, dimethylmethylene blue assays and histology. All biomaterials showed an increase in chondrogenic gene expression and extracellular matrix production over 21 days, but this was superior in the NCC bioink. Biocompatibility assessments revealed an increase in cell number and metabolism over 21 days in the NCC and NCB formulations. Nanocellulose augments printability and chondrogenicity of bioinks, of which the NCC and NCB formulations offer the best biological promise for bioprinting cartilage.
Keywords: Cartilage, Bioprinting, Nanocellulose, Alginate
College: Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
Funders: This study was supported by The Scar Free Foundation & Health and Care Research Wales Programme of research in Reconstructive Surgery & Regenerative Medicine, which has been established in the ReconRegen Research Centre at Swansea University in partnership with Swansea Bay University Health Board. This work was additionally supported by Action Medical Research and the VTCT Foundation (Grant Number 2782), the Royal College of Surgeons England and the Welsh Clinical Academic Training Programme.
Start Page: 121261