Journal article 138 views 9 downloads
Analysing Data With Members of a Stigmatised Community: Experiences, Reflections and Recommendations for Best Practice From the Finding the Formula Community Analysis Group
,
Tara McNamara,
Jonie Cooper,
Susan Dvorak,
Abbie Dolling,
Rebecca Ellis ,
Carol McIntyre,
Sara Jones ,
Amy Brown
International Journal of Qualitative Methods, Volume: 23
Swansea University Authors:
Aimee Grant , Rebecca Ellis , Sara Jones , Amy Brown
-
PDF | Version of Record
© The Author(s) 2024. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
Download (809.51KB)
DOI (Published version): 10.1177/16094069241229983
Abstract
Participatory research approaches hold potential to better understand society through valuing lived experience. Formula feeding babies is routinely stigmatised in the UK, despite inadequate support to facilitate breastfeeding. Our community science project investigated the safety of powdered infant...
| Published in: | International Journal of Qualitative Methods |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1609-4069 1609-4069 |
| Published: |
London
SAGE Publications
2024
|
| Online Access: |
Check full text
|
| URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa65498 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Abstract: |
Participatory research approaches hold potential to better understand society through valuing lived experience. Formula feeding babies is routinely stigmatised in the UK, despite inadequate support to facilitate breastfeeding. Our community science project investigated the safety of powdered infant formula preparation in the home through the completion of an at-home experiment and a research diary with closed and open questions (n=151). To add validity to the interpretation of open text, data in research diaries and to contextualise this, a community analysis group of five formula-feeding mothers was established. The community analysts undertook inductive thematic analysis through a series of analysis group meetings around data extracts, contributed to the study’s empirical outputs and this methodological output, meeting 23 times over a nine-month period. Detailed notes were taken during meetings and the methodological elements of these were thematically analysed with the community analysts to produce this article, with extracts from the academic researchers’ field notes added where relevant. The overarching themes, presenting both positive experiences and areas for improvement, focused on: (i) clarity of expectations and the impact this had on community analysts’ confidence, (ii) the stigmatising topic area and how this was managed by the facilitators, and (iii) feeling valued, in relation to honoraria, inclusion in outputs and community analysts coming to recognise their own expertise. Furthermore, the community analysts co-produced recommendations for including community analysts in future research. It provides guidance on how this can be appropriately funded and supported by funding bodies and research teams, as well as providing guidance on recruitment and chairing meetings. We hope that this article can provide valuable input into how to involve the community more inclusively as research partners in qualitative analysis related to stigmatised topics. |
|---|---|
| Keywords: |
action research; participatory action research; community science; citizen science; qualitative; qualitative analysis; infant feeding; formula feeding |
| College: |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
| Funders: |
UK Research and Innovation, Food Standards Agency, BB/W009188/1 |