Journal article 59 views 29 downloads
Exploring the Philosophy of Mathematics: Beyond Logicism and Platonism
Richard Startup
Open Journal of Philosophy, Volume: 14, Issue: 02, Pages: 219 - 243
Swansea University Author: Richard Startup
-
PDF | Version of Record
Copyright © 2024 by author(s) and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0).
Download (365.8KB)
DOI (Published version): 10.4236/ojpp.2024.142017
Abstract
A perspective in the philosophy of mathematics is developed from a consideration of the strengths and limitations of both logicism and platonism, with an early focus on Frege’s work. Importantly, although many set-theoretic structures may be developed each of which offers limited isomorphism with th...
| Published in: | Open Journal of Philosophy |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2163-9434 2163-9442 |
| Published: |
Scientific Research Publishing, Inc.
2024
|
| Online Access: |
Check full text
|
| URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa66085 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| first_indexed |
2024-04-18T15:46:30Z |
|---|---|
| last_indexed |
2024-04-18T15:46:30Z |
| id |
cronfa66085 |
| recordtype |
SURis |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rfc1807 xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>66085</id><entry>2024-04-18</entry><title>Exploring the Philosophy of Mathematics: Beyond Logicism and Platonism</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>d86a8b1f7833763cea35d2b88386d0d4</sid><firstname>Richard</firstname><surname>Startup</surname><name>Richard Startup</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2024-04-18</date><deptcode>FGHSS</deptcode><abstract>A perspective in the philosophy of mathematics is developed from a consideration of the strengths and limitations of both logicism and platonism, with an early focus on Frege’s work. Importantly, although many set-theoretic structures may be developed each of which offers limited isomorphism with the system of natural numbers, no one of them may be identified with it. Furthermore, the timeless, ever present nature of mathematical concepts and results itself offers direct access, in the face of a platonist account which generates a supposed problem of access. Crucially too, pure mathematics has its own distinctive method of confirming or validating results - mathematical proof - which supplies a higher level of confidence and objectivity than that available elsewhere. The dichotomy of invention and discovery is too jejune a framework for analysing creative mathematical activity. The Gödelian platonist perspective is evaluated and queried through scrutiny of the part played by mathematical resources and constraints in relation to human activity. It appears that there can be non-causal mathematical explanations and mathematical constraint on purely natural processes. Valuable implications of Quine’s naturalism are explored, but one must be cautious of his thesis of confirmational holism. The distinction between algebraic and non-algebraic mathematical theories usefully contributes to our understanding of the internally differentiated nature of the subject.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Open Journal of Philosophy</journal><volume>14</volume><journalNumber>02</journalNumber><paginationStart>219</paginationStart><paginationEnd>243</paginationEnd><publisher>Scientific Research Publishing, Inc.</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>2163-9434</issnPrint><issnElectronic>2163-9442</issnElectronic><keywords>Logicism, Platonism, Gödel’s Platonism, Quine’s Naturalism, Confirmational Holism, Algebraic and Non-Algebraic Mathematical Theories</keywords><publishedDay>9</publishedDay><publishedMonth>4</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2024</publishedYear><publishedDate>2024-04-09</publishedDate><doi>10.4236/ojpp.2024.142017</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Humanities and Social Sciences - Faculty</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>FGHSS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><funders/><projectreference/><lastEdited>2024-04-23T10:36:49.0617303</lastEdited><Created>2024-04-18T16:41:51.2367827</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Social Sciences - Criminology, Sociology and Social Policy</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Richard</firstname><surname>Startup</surname><order>1</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>66085__30066__c106e62e92114a18a0d2990ccd20b8dc.pdf</filename><originalFilename>66085.VoR.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2024-04-18T16:46:56.5263027</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>374579</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>Copyright © 2024 by author(s) and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0).</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
| spelling |
v2 66085 2024-04-18 Exploring the Philosophy of Mathematics: Beyond Logicism and Platonism d86a8b1f7833763cea35d2b88386d0d4 Richard Startup Richard Startup true false 2024-04-18 FGHSS A perspective in the philosophy of mathematics is developed from a consideration of the strengths and limitations of both logicism and platonism, with an early focus on Frege’s work. Importantly, although many set-theoretic structures may be developed each of which offers limited isomorphism with the system of natural numbers, no one of them may be identified with it. Furthermore, the timeless, ever present nature of mathematical concepts and results itself offers direct access, in the face of a platonist account which generates a supposed problem of access. Crucially too, pure mathematics has its own distinctive method of confirming or validating results - mathematical proof - which supplies a higher level of confidence and objectivity than that available elsewhere. The dichotomy of invention and discovery is too jejune a framework for analysing creative mathematical activity. The Gödelian platonist perspective is evaluated and queried through scrutiny of the part played by mathematical resources and constraints in relation to human activity. It appears that there can be non-causal mathematical explanations and mathematical constraint on purely natural processes. Valuable implications of Quine’s naturalism are explored, but one must be cautious of his thesis of confirmational holism. The distinction between algebraic and non-algebraic mathematical theories usefully contributes to our understanding of the internally differentiated nature of the subject. Journal Article Open Journal of Philosophy 14 02 219 243 Scientific Research Publishing, Inc. 2163-9434 2163-9442 Logicism, Platonism, Gödel’s Platonism, Quine’s Naturalism, Confirmational Holism, Algebraic and Non-Algebraic Mathematical Theories 9 4 2024 2024-04-09 10.4236/ojpp.2024.142017 COLLEGE NANME Humanities and Social Sciences - Faculty COLLEGE CODE FGHSS Swansea University 2024-04-23T10:36:49.0617303 2024-04-18T16:41:51.2367827 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences School of Social Sciences - Criminology, Sociology and Social Policy Richard Startup 1 66085__30066__c106e62e92114a18a0d2990ccd20b8dc.pdf 66085.VoR.pdf 2024-04-18T16:46:56.5263027 Output 374579 application/pdf Version of Record true Copyright © 2024 by author(s) and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0). true eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| title |
Exploring the Philosophy of Mathematics: Beyond Logicism and Platonism |
| spellingShingle |
Exploring the Philosophy of Mathematics: Beyond Logicism and Platonism Richard Startup |
| title_short |
Exploring the Philosophy of Mathematics: Beyond Logicism and Platonism |
| title_full |
Exploring the Philosophy of Mathematics: Beyond Logicism and Platonism |
| title_fullStr |
Exploring the Philosophy of Mathematics: Beyond Logicism and Platonism |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Exploring the Philosophy of Mathematics: Beyond Logicism and Platonism |
| title_sort |
Exploring the Philosophy of Mathematics: Beyond Logicism and Platonism |
| author_id_str_mv |
d86a8b1f7833763cea35d2b88386d0d4 |
| author_id_fullname_str_mv |
d86a8b1f7833763cea35d2b88386d0d4_***_Richard Startup |
| author |
Richard Startup |
| author2 |
Richard Startup |
| format |
Journal article |
| container_title |
Open Journal of Philosophy |
| container_volume |
14 |
| container_issue |
02 |
| container_start_page |
219 |
| publishDate |
2024 |
| institution |
Swansea University |
| issn |
2163-9434 2163-9442 |
| doi_str_mv |
10.4236/ojpp.2024.142017 |
| publisher |
Scientific Research Publishing, Inc. |
| college_str |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
| hierarchytype |
|
| hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
| department_str |
School of Social Sciences - Criminology, Sociology and Social Policy{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Social Sciences - Criminology, Sociology and Social Policy |
| document_store_str |
1 |
| active_str |
0 |
| description |
A perspective in the philosophy of mathematics is developed from a consideration of the strengths and limitations of both logicism and platonism, with an early focus on Frege’s work. Importantly, although many set-theoretic structures may be developed each of which offers limited isomorphism with the system of natural numbers, no one of them may be identified with it. Furthermore, the timeless, ever present nature of mathematical concepts and results itself offers direct access, in the face of a platonist account which generates a supposed problem of access. Crucially too, pure mathematics has its own distinctive method of confirming or validating results - mathematical proof - which supplies a higher level of confidence and objectivity than that available elsewhere. The dichotomy of invention and discovery is too jejune a framework for analysing creative mathematical activity. The Gödelian platonist perspective is evaluated and queried through scrutiny of the part played by mathematical resources and constraints in relation to human activity. It appears that there can be non-causal mathematical explanations and mathematical constraint on purely natural processes. Valuable implications of Quine’s naturalism are explored, but one must be cautious of his thesis of confirmational holism. The distinction between algebraic and non-algebraic mathematical theories usefully contributes to our understanding of the internally differentiated nature of the subject. |
| published_date |
2024-04-09T10:36:46Z |
| _version_ |
1797117713356685312 |
| score |
11.014537 |