Journal article 5 views
Determination of the optimal dose and dosing strategy for effective L-menthol oral rinsing during exercise in hot environments
European Journal of Applied Physiology
Swansea University Author:
Mark Waldron
Abstract
Purpose This multi-study programme investigated the optimal concentration of L-menthol delivered as an oral mouth rinse to modulate thermo-behaviour during exercise in a hot environment (35 oC).Method In study 1, 38 participants completed a survey to establish an effective and tolerable range of L-m...
Published in: | European Journal of Applied Physiology |
---|---|
Published: |
|
URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa67599 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
first_indexed |
2024-09-06T08:36:34Z |
---|---|
last_indexed |
2024-09-06T08:36:34Z |
id |
cronfa67599 |
recordtype |
SURis |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rfc1807 xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>67599</id><entry>2024-09-06</entry><title>Determination of the optimal dose and dosing strategy for effective L-menthol oral rinsing during exercise in hot environments</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>70db7c6c54d46f5e70b39e5ae0a056fa</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-2720-4615</ORCID><firstname>Mark</firstname><surname>Waldron</surname><name>Mark Waldron</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2024-09-06</date><deptcode>EAAS</deptcode><abstract>Purpose This multi-study programme investigated the optimal concentration of L-menthol delivered as an oral mouth rinse to modulate thermo-behaviour during exercise in a hot environment (35 oC).Method In study 1, 38 participants completed a survey to establish an effective and tolerable range of L-menthol concentration. 31 participants completed an RPE-protocol examining 1. the dose-response effect of L-menthol mouth rinse on exercise performance (n = 16) and 2. the temporal effectiveness of administering L-menthol in an incremental and decremental dosing pattern (n = 15). Power output, heart rate, body core temperature and thermal sensation were reported throughout. ResultsThe optimal menthol concentration for peak power was between 0.01 & 0.1% (~6 % increase, P < 0.05) and 0.5% (~9 % increase, P < 0.05) with respect to control. Work completed was increased at 0.01% (~5 %, P < 0.05), at 0.1% (~3 %, P < 0.05) and had a detrimental effect at 0.5% (-10% decrease, P < 0.05). There were no differences between an ascending dose protocol (0.01 to 0.5 %), descending dose protocol (0.5 to 0.01 %) or a constant 0.01% dose protocol. There were no reported differences in body core temperature or heart rate across trials (P > 0.05). ConclusionThe optimal dose of L-menthol when delivered via oral rinsing is between 0.01 – 0.1 %. At lower concentrations, L-menthol appears to be less effective and at higher concentrations (>0.5%), L-menthol appears to elicit greater irritation and may not positively modulate thermo-behaviour during exercise in a hot environment.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>European Journal of Applied Physiology</journal><volume/><journalNumber/><paginationStart/><paginationEnd/><publisher/><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint/><issnElectronic/><keywords/><publishedDay>0</publishedDay><publishedMonth>0</publishedMonth><publishedYear>0</publishedYear><publishedDate>0001-01-01</publishedDate><doi/><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Engineering and Applied Sciences School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>EAAS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><funders/><projectreference/><lastEdited>2024-09-06T09:36:35.2964726</lastEdited><Created>2024-09-06T09:33:10.2976954</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Science and Engineering</level><level id="2">School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Sport and Exercise Sciences</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Jeffries,</firstname><surname>Owen</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>Jibi,</firstname><surname>Godi</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Clark,</firstname><surname>Joe</surname><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Barwood,</firstname><surname>Martin</surname><order>4</order></author><author><firstname>Mark</firstname><surname>Waldron</surname><orcid>0000-0002-2720-4615</orcid><order>5</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
spelling |
v2 67599 2024-09-06 Determination of the optimal dose and dosing strategy for effective L-menthol oral rinsing during exercise in hot environments 70db7c6c54d46f5e70b39e5ae0a056fa 0000-0002-2720-4615 Mark Waldron Mark Waldron true false 2024-09-06 EAAS Purpose This multi-study programme investigated the optimal concentration of L-menthol delivered as an oral mouth rinse to modulate thermo-behaviour during exercise in a hot environment (35 oC).Method In study 1, 38 participants completed a survey to establish an effective and tolerable range of L-menthol concentration. 31 participants completed an RPE-protocol examining 1. the dose-response effect of L-menthol mouth rinse on exercise performance (n = 16) and 2. the temporal effectiveness of administering L-menthol in an incremental and decremental dosing pattern (n = 15). Power output, heart rate, body core temperature and thermal sensation were reported throughout. ResultsThe optimal menthol concentration for peak power was between 0.01 & 0.1% (~6 % increase, P < 0.05) and 0.5% (~9 % increase, P < 0.05) with respect to control. Work completed was increased at 0.01% (~5 %, P < 0.05), at 0.1% (~3 %, P < 0.05) and had a detrimental effect at 0.5% (-10% decrease, P < 0.05). There were no differences between an ascending dose protocol (0.01 to 0.5 %), descending dose protocol (0.5 to 0.01 %) or a constant 0.01% dose protocol. There were no reported differences in body core temperature or heart rate across trials (P > 0.05). ConclusionThe optimal dose of L-menthol when delivered via oral rinsing is between 0.01 – 0.1 %. At lower concentrations, L-menthol appears to be less effective and at higher concentrations (>0.5%), L-menthol appears to elicit greater irritation and may not positively modulate thermo-behaviour during exercise in a hot environment. Journal Article European Journal of Applied Physiology 0 0 0 0001-01-01 COLLEGE NANME Engineering and Applied Sciences School COLLEGE CODE EAAS Swansea University 2024-09-06T09:36:35.2964726 2024-09-06T09:33:10.2976954 Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Sport and Exercise Sciences Jeffries, Owen 1 Jibi, Godi 2 Clark, Joe 3 Barwood, Martin 4 Mark Waldron 0000-0002-2720-4615 5 |
title |
Determination of the optimal dose and dosing strategy for effective L-menthol oral rinsing during exercise in hot environments |
spellingShingle |
Determination of the optimal dose and dosing strategy for effective L-menthol oral rinsing during exercise in hot environments Mark Waldron |
title_short |
Determination of the optimal dose and dosing strategy for effective L-menthol oral rinsing during exercise in hot environments |
title_full |
Determination of the optimal dose and dosing strategy for effective L-menthol oral rinsing during exercise in hot environments |
title_fullStr |
Determination of the optimal dose and dosing strategy for effective L-menthol oral rinsing during exercise in hot environments |
title_full_unstemmed |
Determination of the optimal dose and dosing strategy for effective L-menthol oral rinsing during exercise in hot environments |
title_sort |
Determination of the optimal dose and dosing strategy for effective L-menthol oral rinsing during exercise in hot environments |
author_id_str_mv |
70db7c6c54d46f5e70b39e5ae0a056fa |
author_id_fullname_str_mv |
70db7c6c54d46f5e70b39e5ae0a056fa_***_Mark Waldron |
author |
Mark Waldron |
author2 |
Jeffries, Owen Jibi, Godi Clark, Joe Barwood, Martin Mark Waldron |
format |
Journal article |
container_title |
European Journal of Applied Physiology |
institution |
Swansea University |
college_str |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
hierarchytype |
|
hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofscienceandengineering |
hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofscienceandengineering |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Science and Engineering |
department_str |
School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Sport and Exercise Sciences{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Science and Engineering{{{_:::_}}}School of Engineering and Applied Sciences - Sport and Exercise Sciences |
document_store_str |
0 |
active_str |
0 |
description |
Purpose This multi-study programme investigated the optimal concentration of L-menthol delivered as an oral mouth rinse to modulate thermo-behaviour during exercise in a hot environment (35 oC).Method In study 1, 38 participants completed a survey to establish an effective and tolerable range of L-menthol concentration. 31 participants completed an RPE-protocol examining 1. the dose-response effect of L-menthol mouth rinse on exercise performance (n = 16) and 2. the temporal effectiveness of administering L-menthol in an incremental and decremental dosing pattern (n = 15). Power output, heart rate, body core temperature and thermal sensation were reported throughout. ResultsThe optimal menthol concentration for peak power was between 0.01 & 0.1% (~6 % increase, P < 0.05) and 0.5% (~9 % increase, P < 0.05) with respect to control. Work completed was increased at 0.01% (~5 %, P < 0.05), at 0.1% (~3 %, P < 0.05) and had a detrimental effect at 0.5% (-10% decrease, P < 0.05). There were no differences between an ascending dose protocol (0.01 to 0.5 %), descending dose protocol (0.5 to 0.01 %) or a constant 0.01% dose protocol. There were no reported differences in body core temperature or heart rate across trials (P > 0.05). ConclusionThe optimal dose of L-menthol when delivered via oral rinsing is between 0.01 – 0.1 %. At lower concentrations, L-menthol appears to be less effective and at higher concentrations (>0.5%), L-menthol appears to elicit greater irritation and may not positively modulate thermo-behaviour during exercise in a hot environment. |
published_date |
0001-01-01T09:36:34Z |
_version_ |
1809435113517219840 |
score |
11.025749 |