No Cover Image

Conference Paper/Proceeding/Abstract 29 views

Developing learning: A comparative study on the use of AI and traditional literature search methods in enhancing critical thinking and information selection skills

Joy Jia Orcid Logo

INTED Proceedings, Volume: 1, Pages: 160 - 165

Swansea University Author: Joy Jia Orcid Logo

Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.21125/inted.2025.0077

Abstract

The rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has transformed academic research by enabling rapid information retrieval. AI tools like ChatGPT offer efficiency but raise concerns about critical thinking and cognitive engagement. This study compares AI-driven research with traditional search methods, such...

Full description

Published in: INTED Proceedings
ISSN: 2340-1079
Published: IATED Digital Library IATED 2025
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa69164
first_indexed 2025-03-28T11:48:09Z
last_indexed 2025-04-09T04:41:13Z
id cronfa69164
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807 xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><datestamp>2025-04-08T15:38:09.0354291</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>69164</id><entry>2025-03-28</entry><title>Developing learning: A comparative study on the use of AI and traditional literature search methods in enhancing critical thinking and information selection skills</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>2d215b93ea1160b2f73dbeb4df908564</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-0419-2797</ORCID><firstname>Joy</firstname><surname>Jia</surname><name>Joy Jia</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2025-03-28</date><deptcode>CBAE</deptcode><abstract>The rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has transformed academic research by enabling rapid information retrieval. AI tools like ChatGPT offer efficiency but raise concerns about critical thinking and cognitive engagement. This study compares AI-driven research with traditional search methods, such as Google Scholar, assessing their impact on students&#x2019; ability to critically engage with material, synthesize ideas, and develop original insights. Findings show that while AI aids initial knowledge acquisition, traditional methods foster deeper learning, stronger critical thinking, and greater originality. The Google Scholar group outperformed the ChatGPT group in synthesis, critical evaluation, and research question development. Moreover, students using traditional search methods completed complex tasks more effectively and in less time. While AI serves as a useful starting point, traditional methods remain essential for deep learning. Future research should explore structured AI prompt training to enhance critical engagement with AI-generated content while maintaining the depth of traditional research practices.</abstract><type>Conference Paper/Proceeding/Abstract</type><journal>INTED Proceedings</journal><volume>1</volume><journalNumber/><paginationStart>160</paginationStart><paginationEnd>165</paginationEnd><publisher>IATED</publisher><placeOfPublication>IATED Digital Library</placeOfPublication><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint/><issnElectronic>2340-1079</issnElectronic><keywords>AI, ChatGPT, learning development, literature search</keywords><publishedDay>3</publishedDay><publishedMonth>3</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2025</publishedYear><publishedDate>2025-03-03</publishedDate><doi>10.21125/inted.2025.0077</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Management School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>CBAE</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm>Not Required</apcterm><funders/><projectreference/><lastEdited>2025-04-08T15:38:09.0354291</lastEdited><Created>2025-03-28T11:22:48.4704844</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Management - Accounting and Finance</level></path><authors><author><firstname>Joy</firstname><surname>Jia</surname><orcid>0000-0002-0419-2797</orcid><order>1</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs><OutputDur><Id>317</Id><IsDataAvailableOnline xsi:nil="true"/><DataNotAvailableOnlineReasonId xsi:nil="true"/><IsDurRestrictions xsi:nil="true"/><DurRestrictionReasonId xsi:nil="true"/><DurEmbargoDate xsi:nil="true"/></OutputDur></OutputDurs></rfc1807>
spelling 2025-04-08T15:38:09.0354291 v2 69164 2025-03-28 Developing learning: A comparative study on the use of AI and traditional literature search methods in enhancing critical thinking and information selection skills 2d215b93ea1160b2f73dbeb4df908564 0000-0002-0419-2797 Joy Jia Joy Jia true false 2025-03-28 CBAE The rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has transformed academic research by enabling rapid information retrieval. AI tools like ChatGPT offer efficiency but raise concerns about critical thinking and cognitive engagement. This study compares AI-driven research with traditional search methods, such as Google Scholar, assessing their impact on students’ ability to critically engage with material, synthesize ideas, and develop original insights. Findings show that while AI aids initial knowledge acquisition, traditional methods foster deeper learning, stronger critical thinking, and greater originality. The Google Scholar group outperformed the ChatGPT group in synthesis, critical evaluation, and research question development. Moreover, students using traditional search methods completed complex tasks more effectively and in less time. While AI serves as a useful starting point, traditional methods remain essential for deep learning. Future research should explore structured AI prompt training to enhance critical engagement with AI-generated content while maintaining the depth of traditional research practices. Conference Paper/Proceeding/Abstract INTED Proceedings 1 160 165 IATED IATED Digital Library 2340-1079 AI, ChatGPT, learning development, literature search 3 3 2025 2025-03-03 10.21125/inted.2025.0077 COLLEGE NANME Management School COLLEGE CODE CBAE Swansea University Not Required 2025-04-08T15:38:09.0354291 2025-03-28T11:22:48.4704844 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences School of Management - Accounting and Finance Joy Jia 0000-0002-0419-2797 1 317
title Developing learning: A comparative study on the use of AI and traditional literature search methods in enhancing critical thinking and information selection skills
spellingShingle Developing learning: A comparative study on the use of AI and traditional literature search methods in enhancing critical thinking and information selection skills
Joy Jia
title_short Developing learning: A comparative study on the use of AI and traditional literature search methods in enhancing critical thinking and information selection skills
title_full Developing learning: A comparative study on the use of AI and traditional literature search methods in enhancing critical thinking and information selection skills
title_fullStr Developing learning: A comparative study on the use of AI and traditional literature search methods in enhancing critical thinking and information selection skills
title_full_unstemmed Developing learning: A comparative study on the use of AI and traditional literature search methods in enhancing critical thinking and information selection skills
title_sort Developing learning: A comparative study on the use of AI and traditional literature search methods in enhancing critical thinking and information selection skills
author_id_str_mv 2d215b93ea1160b2f73dbeb4df908564
author_id_fullname_str_mv 2d215b93ea1160b2f73dbeb4df908564_***_Joy Jia
author Joy Jia
author2 Joy Jia
format Conference Paper/Proceeding/Abstract
container_title INTED Proceedings
container_volume 1
container_start_page 160
publishDate 2025
institution Swansea University
issn 2340-1079
doi_str_mv 10.21125/inted.2025.0077
publisher IATED
college_str Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
department_str School of Management - Accounting and Finance{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Management - Accounting and Finance
document_store_str 0
active_str 0
description The rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has transformed academic research by enabling rapid information retrieval. AI tools like ChatGPT offer efficiency but raise concerns about critical thinking and cognitive engagement. This study compares AI-driven research with traditional search methods, such as Google Scholar, assessing their impact on students’ ability to critically engage with material, synthesize ideas, and develop original insights. Findings show that while AI aids initial knowledge acquisition, traditional methods foster deeper learning, stronger critical thinking, and greater originality. The Google Scholar group outperformed the ChatGPT group in synthesis, critical evaluation, and research question development. Moreover, students using traditional search methods completed complex tasks more effectively and in less time. While AI serves as a useful starting point, traditional methods remain essential for deep learning. Future research should explore structured AI prompt training to enhance critical engagement with AI-generated content while maintaining the depth of traditional research practices.
published_date 2025-03-03T08:23:48Z
_version_ 1828908882518343680
score 11.056959

Similar Items