Journal article 1101 views
Decision noise may mask criterion shifts: Reply to Balakrishnan and MacDonald (2008)
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, Volume: 15, Issue: 5, Pages: 1031 - 1034
Swansea University Author: Christoph Weidemann
Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.
DOI (Published version): 10.3758/PBR.15.5.1031
Abstract
J. D. Balakrishnan and J. A. MacDonald (2008) argue that RTbased measures of signal detection processes provide evidence against signal detection theory’s notion of a flexible decision criterion. They argue that this evidence is immune to the alternative explanation proposed by S. T. Mueller and C....
| Published in: | Psychonomic Bulletin & Review |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1069-9384 1531-5320 |
| Published: |
2008
|
| Online Access: |
Check full text
|
| URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa6930 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Abstract: |
J. D. Balakrishnan and J. A. MacDonald (2008) argue that RTbased measures of signal detection processes provide evidence against signal detection theory’s notion of a flexible decision criterion. They argue that this evidence is immune to the alternative explanation proposed by S. T. Mueller and C. T. Weidemann (2008), that decision noise may mask criterion shifts. We show that noise in response times can produce the same effects as are produced by noise in confidence ratings. Given these results, the evidence is not sufficient to categorically reject the notion of a flexible response policy implemented through shifts in a decision criterion. |
|---|---|
| College: |
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences |
| Issue: |
5 |
| Start Page: |
1031 |
| End Page: |
1034 |