No Cover Image

Journal article 277 views 12 downloads

Understanding the cellular uptake and genotoxic potential of industrial relevant nanomaterials utilizing electron microscopy and the ToxTracker assay in vitro

Stephen Evans Orcid Logo, Nynke Moelijker, Inger Brandsma Orcid Logo, Michael Burgum, Rosalie Elespuru, Giel Hendriks Orcid Logo, shareen Doak

Mutagenesis, Volume: 40, Issue: 4, Pages: 550 - 559

Swansea University Authors: Stephen Evans Orcid Logo, Michael Burgum, shareen Doak

  • 69838.VOR.pdf

    PDF | Version of Record

    © The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the UK Environmental Mutagen Society. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).

    Download (1.25MB)

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1093/mutage/geaf013

Abstract

Evaluating genotoxic potential of nanomaterials presents unique challenges not associated with traditional toxicological assessment. The exceptional properties and complexities of these nanomaterials require additional considerations and protocol modifications to assess and fully interpret genotoxic...

Full description

Published in: Mutagenesis
ISSN: 0267-8357 1464-3804
Published: Oxford University Press (OUP) 2025
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa69838
Abstract: Evaluating genotoxic potential of nanomaterials presents unique challenges not associated with traditional toxicological assessment. The exceptional properties and complexities of these nanomaterials require additional considerations and protocol modifications to assess and fully interpret genotoxicity potential. A key question in any nanomaterial focused toxicity study is whether the material has reached the target cell and what its subsequent sub-cellular localisation is. This current study aimed to assess the potential of a panel of industrial relevant nanomaterials; TiO2-NM102, TiO2-NM105, TiO2-E171, silica, polyethylene, polystyrene, carbon black, Gold nanorods, tungsten carbide/cobalt and tungsten carbide, to undergo cellular uptake in mouse embryonic stem cells (mES) that are applied in the ToxTracker genotoxicity assay. Ultrastructural cellular analysis by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was undertaken following 100 μg/ml treatment with the test nanomaterials for 24 h, any observed uptake was confirmed by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Induction of DNA damage, cytotoxicity, p53 activation, protein stress, and oxidative stress was evaluated by the ToxTracker assay following 24 h treatment with the test nanomaterials (0-100 μg/ml) in the absence of S9. TiO2-NM105, silica, polystyrene carbon black and tungsten carbide were all shown to undergo cellular uptake, localised in membrane bound vesicles within the cytoplasm. None of the internalised nanomaterials promoted a genotoxic response in ToxTracker, similarly no DNA damage was observed by the materials not internalised. Interestingly, of the internalised nanomaterials only polystyrene caused a slight cytotoxic response at 100 μg/ml treatment (10% loss in cell viability). Of the nanomaterials not internalised, cytotoxicity was observed in mES cells treated with 100 μg/ml TiO2-NM102 (15%), polyethylene (15%), Gold nanorods (35%) and tungsten carbide/cobalt (45%). In summary this study demonstrated that TiO2-NM105, silica, polystyrene carbon black and tungsten carbide are non-genotoxic in vitro despite undergoing cell uptake in the ToxTracker cells. A continued focus is needed to supplement nanomaterial genotoxicity studies with cellular uptake analysis.
Keywords: nanomaterial, genotoxicity, ToxTracker, uptake
College: Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
Funders: The authors would like to acknowledge that this research has received funding from The Health and Environmental Sciences Institute Genetic Toxicology Technical Committee.
Issue: 4
Start Page: 550
End Page: 559