Journal article 108 views 2 downloads
Guiding principles for modelling-based papers published in Futures
Futures, Volume: 179
Swansea University Author:
Chris Groves
-
PDF | Version of Record
© 2026 The Authors. This is an open access article under the CC BY license.
Download (561.76KB)
DOI (Published version): 10.1016/j.futures.2026.103813
Abstract
This article offers a critical reflection on the role of mathematical modelling in futures studies. It is written by members of the Futures editorial team and intended to guide authors interested in submitting papers on the formal modelling of futures to the journal. While models are increasingly pr...
| Published in: | Futures |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0016-3287 |
| Published: |
Elsevier BV
2026
|
| Online Access: |
Check full text
|
| URI: | https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa71664 |
| first_indexed |
2026-03-24T09:09:49Z |
|---|---|
| last_indexed |
2026-04-24T07:12:09Z |
| id |
cronfa71664 |
| recordtype |
SURis |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2026-04-23T14:23:22.1240467</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>71664</id><entry>2026-03-24</entry><title>Guiding principles for modelling-based papers published in Futures</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>847beea4d3481c4df56d0545a06d7c5b</sid><ORCID>0000-0002-5873-1119</ORCID><firstname>Chris</firstname><surname>Groves</surname><name>Chris Groves</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2026-03-24</date><deptcode>SOSS</deptcode><abstract>This article offers a critical reflection on the role of mathematical modelling in futures studies. It is written by members of the Futures editorial team and intended to guide authors interested in submitting papers on the formal modelling of futures to the journal. While models are increasingly prominent in shaping visions of the future across science, policy, and society, their use raises fundamental concerns. The paper outlines three key challenges: the limitations of models in handling novelty and surprise, their counter-performative effects in shaping rather than simply anticipating futures, and the epistemological consequences of their dominance in evidence-based policymaking. Drawing on critiques from science and technology studies, economics, and complexity theory, the authors argue for a more reflexive, inclusive, and pluralistic approach to modelling. They propose six guiding principles—transparency, reflexivity, inclusivity, complexity (not complicatedness), relevance over precision, and contribution—to guide submissions to Futures. The goal is to ensure that modelling contributes meaningfully to the field’s core mission: the collective construction of better futures, and to help authors in writing papers that are appropriately reflexive towards the use of models in futures work.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Futures</journal><volume>179</volume><journalNumber/><paginationStart/><paginationEnd/><publisher>Elsevier BV</publisher><placeOfPublication/><isbnPrint/><isbnElectronic/><issnPrint>0016-3287</issnPrint><issnElectronic/><keywords>modelling; uncertainty; futures; complexity</keywords><publishedDay>1</publishedDay><publishedMonth>5</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2026</publishedYear><publishedDate>2026-05-01</publishedDate><doi>10.1016/j.futures.2026.103813</doi><url/><notes/><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Social Sciences School</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>SOSS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm>Another institution paid the OA fee</apcterm><funders>None</funders><projectreference/><lastEdited>2026-04-23T14:23:22.1240467</lastEdited><Created>2026-03-24T09:06:28.2955121</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Social Sciences - Criminology, Sociology and Social Policy</level></path><authors><author><firstname>James</firstname><surname>Derbyshire</surname><orcid>0000-0002-1505-412x</orcid><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>SJ</firstname><surname>Beard</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Chris</firstname><surname>Groves</surname><orcid>0000-0002-5873-1119</orcid><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>Zora</firstname><surname>Kovacic</surname><order>4</order></author><author><firstname>Richard</firstname><surname>Sandford</surname><orcid>0000-0001-7022-8674</orcid><order>5</order></author></authors><documents><document><filename>71664__36577__11b57e7bdf3c46caa485601b083a55a2.pdf</filename><originalFilename>71664.VoR.pdf</originalFilename><uploaded>2026-04-23T14:20:41.6321298</uploaded><type>Output</type><contentLength>575239</contentLength><contentType>application/pdf</contentType><version>Version of Record</version><cronfaStatus>true</cronfaStatus><documentNotes>© 2026 The Authors. This is an open access article under the CC BY license.</documentNotes><copyrightCorrect>true</copyrightCorrect><language>eng</language><licence>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</licence></document></documents><OutputDurs/></rfc1807> |
| spelling |
2026-04-23T14:23:22.1240467 v2 71664 2026-03-24 Guiding principles for modelling-based papers published in Futures 847beea4d3481c4df56d0545a06d7c5b 0000-0002-5873-1119 Chris Groves Chris Groves true false 2026-03-24 SOSS This article offers a critical reflection on the role of mathematical modelling in futures studies. It is written by members of the Futures editorial team and intended to guide authors interested in submitting papers on the formal modelling of futures to the journal. While models are increasingly prominent in shaping visions of the future across science, policy, and society, their use raises fundamental concerns. The paper outlines three key challenges: the limitations of models in handling novelty and surprise, their counter-performative effects in shaping rather than simply anticipating futures, and the epistemological consequences of their dominance in evidence-based policymaking. Drawing on critiques from science and technology studies, economics, and complexity theory, the authors argue for a more reflexive, inclusive, and pluralistic approach to modelling. They propose six guiding principles—transparency, reflexivity, inclusivity, complexity (not complicatedness), relevance over precision, and contribution—to guide submissions to Futures. The goal is to ensure that modelling contributes meaningfully to the field’s core mission: the collective construction of better futures, and to help authors in writing papers that are appropriately reflexive towards the use of models in futures work. Journal Article Futures 179 Elsevier BV 0016-3287 modelling; uncertainty; futures; complexity 1 5 2026 2026-05-01 10.1016/j.futures.2026.103813 COLLEGE NANME Social Sciences School COLLEGE CODE SOSS Swansea University Another institution paid the OA fee None 2026-04-23T14:23:22.1240467 2026-03-24T09:06:28.2955121 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences School of Social Sciences - Criminology, Sociology and Social Policy James Derbyshire 0000-0002-1505-412x 1 SJ Beard 2 Chris Groves 0000-0002-5873-1119 3 Zora Kovacic 4 Richard Sandford 0000-0001-7022-8674 5 71664__36577__11b57e7bdf3c46caa485601b083a55a2.pdf 71664.VoR.pdf 2026-04-23T14:20:41.6321298 Output 575239 application/pdf Version of Record true © 2026 The Authors. This is an open access article under the CC BY license. true eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| title |
Guiding principles for modelling-based papers published in Futures |
| spellingShingle |
Guiding principles for modelling-based papers published in Futures Chris Groves |
| title_short |
Guiding principles for modelling-based papers published in Futures |
| title_full |
Guiding principles for modelling-based papers published in Futures |
| title_fullStr |
Guiding principles for modelling-based papers published in Futures |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Guiding principles for modelling-based papers published in Futures |
| title_sort |
Guiding principles for modelling-based papers published in Futures |
| author_id_str_mv |
847beea4d3481c4df56d0545a06d7c5b |
| author_id_fullname_str_mv |
847beea4d3481c4df56d0545a06d7c5b_***_Chris Groves |
| author |
Chris Groves |
| author2 |
James Derbyshire SJ Beard Chris Groves Zora Kovacic Richard Sandford |
| format |
Journal article |
| container_title |
Futures |
| container_volume |
179 |
| publishDate |
2026 |
| institution |
Swansea University |
| issn |
0016-3287 |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.futures.2026.103813 |
| publisher |
Elsevier BV |
| college_str |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
| hierarchytype |
|
| hierarchy_top_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
facultyofhumanitiesandsocialsciences |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
| department_str |
School of Social Sciences - Criminology, Sociology and Social Policy{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Social Sciences - Criminology, Sociology and Social Policy |
| document_store_str |
1 |
| active_str |
0 |
| description |
This article offers a critical reflection on the role of mathematical modelling in futures studies. It is written by members of the Futures editorial team and intended to guide authors interested in submitting papers on the formal modelling of futures to the journal. While models are increasingly prominent in shaping visions of the future across science, policy, and society, their use raises fundamental concerns. The paper outlines three key challenges: the limitations of models in handling novelty and surprise, their counter-performative effects in shaping rather than simply anticipating futures, and the epistemological consequences of their dominance in evidence-based policymaking. Drawing on critiques from science and technology studies, economics, and complexity theory, the authors argue for a more reflexive, inclusive, and pluralistic approach to modelling. They propose six guiding principles—transparency, reflexivity, inclusivity, complexity (not complicatedness), relevance over precision, and contribution—to guide submissions to Futures. The goal is to ensure that modelling contributes meaningfully to the field’s core mission: the collective construction of better futures, and to help authors in writing papers that are appropriately reflexive towards the use of models in futures work. |
| published_date |
2026-05-01T06:09:06Z |
| _version_ |
1863508449667579904 |
| score |
11.103096 |

