No Cover Image

Journal article 1454 views

A normative study of acronyms and acronym naming

C Izura, D Playfoot, Cristina Izura Orcid Logo, David Playfoot Orcid Logo

Behavior Research Methods

Swansea University Authors: Cristina Izura Orcid Logo, David Playfoot Orcid Logo

Full text not available from this repository: check for access using links below.

DOI (Published version): 10.3758/s13428-011-0175-8

Abstract

Acronyms are an idiosyncratic part of our everydayvocabulary. Research in word processing has used acronymsas a tool to answer fundamental questions such as thenature of the word superiority effect (WSE) or which is thebest way to account for word-reading processes. In thisstudy, acronym naming was...

Full description

Published in: Behavior Research Methods
Published: 2012
URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa10049
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
first_indexed 2013-07-23T12:02:42Z
last_indexed 2018-02-09T04:38:37Z
id cronfa10049
recordtype SURis
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?><rfc1807><datestamp>2014-10-09T17:49:06.0234776</datestamp><bib-version>v2</bib-version><id>10049</id><entry>2012-03-21</entry><title>A normative study of acronyms and acronym naming</title><swanseaauthors><author><sid>334f125cf00274e92560e6229b4657f2</sid><ORCID>0000-0001-9656-4553</ORCID><firstname>Cristina</firstname><surname>Izura</surname><name>Cristina Izura</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author><author><sid>4dbddc73fd0fe464304ba8ad95cbc96e</sid><ORCID>0000-0003-0855-334X</ORCID><firstname>David</firstname><surname>Playfoot</surname><name>David Playfoot</name><active>true</active><ethesisStudent>false</ethesisStudent></author></swanseaauthors><date>2012-03-21</date><deptcode>HPS</deptcode><abstract>Acronyms are an idiosyncratic part of our everydayvocabulary. Research in word processing has used acronymsas a tool to answer fundamental questions such as thenature of the word superiority effect (WSE) or which is thebest way to account for word-reading processes. In thisstudy, acronym naming was assessed by looking at theinfluence that a number of variables known to affect mainstreamword processing has had in acronym naming. Thenature of the effect of these factors on acronym naming wasexamined using a multilevel regression analysis. First, 146acronyms were described in terms of their age of acquisition,bigram and trigram frequencies, imageability, numberof orthographic neighbors, frequency, orthographic and phonologicallength, print-to-pronunciation patterns, and voicingcharacteristics. Naming times were influenced by lexical andsublexical factors, indicating that acronym naming is a complexprocess affected by more variables than those previouslyconsidered.</abstract><type>Journal Article</type><journal>Behavior Research Methods</journal><publisher/><issnPrint/><issnElectronic/><keywords>Acronyms . Norms . Age of acquisition .</keywords><publishedDay>31</publishedDay><publishedMonth>12</publishedMonth><publishedYear>2012</publishedYear><publishedDate>2012-12-31</publishedDate><doi>10.3758/s13428-011-0175-8</doi><url/><notes></notes><college>COLLEGE NANME</college><department>Psychology</department><CollegeCode>COLLEGE CODE</CollegeCode><DepartmentCode>HPS</DepartmentCode><institution>Swansea University</institution><apcterm/><lastEdited>2014-10-09T17:49:06.0234776</lastEdited><Created>2012-03-21T06:52:51.5575054</Created><path><level id="1">Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences</level><level id="2">School of Psychology</level></path><authors><author><firstname>C</firstname><surname>Izura</surname><order>1</order></author><author><firstname>D</firstname><surname>Playfoot</surname><order>2</order></author><author><firstname>Cristina</firstname><surname>Izura</surname><orcid>0000-0001-9656-4553</orcid><order>3</order></author><author><firstname>David</firstname><surname>Playfoot</surname><orcid>0000-0003-0855-334X</orcid><order>4</order></author></authors><documents/><OutputDurs/></rfc1807>
spelling 2014-10-09T17:49:06.0234776 v2 10049 2012-03-21 A normative study of acronyms and acronym naming 334f125cf00274e92560e6229b4657f2 0000-0001-9656-4553 Cristina Izura Cristina Izura true false 4dbddc73fd0fe464304ba8ad95cbc96e 0000-0003-0855-334X David Playfoot David Playfoot true false 2012-03-21 HPS Acronyms are an idiosyncratic part of our everydayvocabulary. Research in word processing has used acronymsas a tool to answer fundamental questions such as thenature of the word superiority effect (WSE) or which is thebest way to account for word-reading processes. In thisstudy, acronym naming was assessed by looking at theinfluence that a number of variables known to affect mainstreamword processing has had in acronym naming. Thenature of the effect of these factors on acronym naming wasexamined using a multilevel regression analysis. First, 146acronyms were described in terms of their age of acquisition,bigram and trigram frequencies, imageability, numberof orthographic neighbors, frequency, orthographic and phonologicallength, print-to-pronunciation patterns, and voicingcharacteristics. Naming times were influenced by lexical andsublexical factors, indicating that acronym naming is a complexprocess affected by more variables than those previouslyconsidered. Journal Article Behavior Research Methods Acronyms . Norms . Age of acquisition . 31 12 2012 2012-12-31 10.3758/s13428-011-0175-8 COLLEGE NANME Psychology COLLEGE CODE HPS Swansea University 2014-10-09T17:49:06.0234776 2012-03-21T06:52:51.5575054 Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences School of Psychology C Izura 1 D Playfoot 2 Cristina Izura 0000-0001-9656-4553 3 David Playfoot 0000-0003-0855-334X 4
title A normative study of acronyms and acronym naming
spellingShingle A normative study of acronyms and acronym naming
Cristina Izura
David Playfoot
title_short A normative study of acronyms and acronym naming
title_full A normative study of acronyms and acronym naming
title_fullStr A normative study of acronyms and acronym naming
title_full_unstemmed A normative study of acronyms and acronym naming
title_sort A normative study of acronyms and acronym naming
author_id_str_mv 334f125cf00274e92560e6229b4657f2
4dbddc73fd0fe464304ba8ad95cbc96e
author_id_fullname_str_mv 334f125cf00274e92560e6229b4657f2_***_Cristina Izura
4dbddc73fd0fe464304ba8ad95cbc96e_***_David Playfoot
author Cristina Izura
David Playfoot
author2 C Izura
D Playfoot
Cristina Izura
David Playfoot
format Journal article
container_title Behavior Research Methods
publishDate 2012
institution Swansea University
doi_str_mv 10.3758/s13428-011-0175-8
college_str Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchytype
hierarchy_top_id facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_top_title Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id facultyofmedicinehealthandlifesciences
hierarchy_parent_title Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
department_str School of Psychology{{{_:::_}}}Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences{{{_:::_}}}School of Psychology
document_store_str 0
active_str 0
description Acronyms are an idiosyncratic part of our everydayvocabulary. Research in word processing has used acronymsas a tool to answer fundamental questions such as thenature of the word superiority effect (WSE) or which is thebest way to account for word-reading processes. In thisstudy, acronym naming was assessed by looking at theinfluence that a number of variables known to affect mainstreamword processing has had in acronym naming. Thenature of the effect of these factors on acronym naming wasexamined using a multilevel regression analysis. First, 146acronyms were described in terms of their age of acquisition,bigram and trigram frequencies, imageability, numberof orthographic neighbors, frequency, orthographic and phonologicallength, print-to-pronunciation patterns, and voicingcharacteristics. Naming times were influenced by lexical andsublexical factors, indicating that acronym naming is a complexprocess affected by more variables than those previouslyconsidered.
published_date 2012-12-31T03:10:40Z
_version_ 1763749963439800320
score 11.016235