No Cover Image

Journal article 42 views 10 downloads

Use of baby food products during the complementary feeding period: What factors drive parents' choice of products?

Grace Hollinrake, Sophia Komninou Orcid Logo, Amy Brown Orcid Logo

Maternal & Child Nutrition, Volume: 20, Issue: 4

Swansea University Authors: Grace Hollinrake, Sophia Komninou Orcid Logo, Amy Brown Orcid Logo

  • 67738.VOR.pdf

    PDF | Version of Record

    © 2024 The Author(s). This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0).

    Download (1.05MB)

Check full text

DOI (Published version): 10.1111/mcn.13689

Abstract

It is recommended that infants are introduced to complementary foods from 6 months old, moving from a solely milk diet to eating a family diet by 12 months old. Although home cooking of family foods is recommended, a rapidly growing market producing baby food products (BFP) such as jars, pouches and...

Full description

Published in: Maternal & Child Nutrition
ISSN: 1740-8695 1740-8709
Published: Wiley 2024
Online Access: Check full text

URI: https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa67738
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract: It is recommended that infants are introduced to complementary foods from 6 months old, moving from a solely milk diet to eating a family diet by 12 months old. Although home cooking of family foods is recommended, a rapidly growing market producing baby food products (BFP) such as jars, pouches and snacks has developed. These are often accompanied by marketing claims around nutritional, health and developmental impacts despite research highlighting high sugar content. Although numerous studies have explored drivers of infant formula choice and use, little research has examined the drivers of BFP use. This study used an online survey for United Kingdom parents of infants aged 4–12 months to explore use of BFP alongside perceptions and drivers to purchase products. Overall, 271 parents participated (173 used BFP and 98 did not), with a descriptive analysis of closed items and a thematic analysis for open ended text conducted. The top motivators for using BFP were convenience, time saving, and baby's perceived enjoyment of products. The most purchased puree was fruit based and the most purchased baby snacks were vegetable puffs/sticks, with snack purchases being more common than purees in this sample. Aspects such as perceived healthiness drove choice, with snack foods being seen to enhance self‐feeding skills, appetite regulation and motor development. Those who did not use BFP did not trust them and preferred to feed their baby home cooked foods. The findings are important for professionals working with parents, to support them through the transition to solid foods, particularly around raising awareness of marketing techniques and how to check content of foods to make a more informed choice.
Keywords: Advertising, baby food, baby food products, complementary feeding, health halo claims, infant feeding, parents
College: Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences
Funders: Swansea University
Issue: 4